| |
|
|
|
Registro Completo |
|
Biblioteca(s): |
Embrapa Agricultura Digital. |
|
Data corrente: |
19/04/2010 |
|
Data da última atualização: |
19/10/2010 |
|
Autoria: |
NAMORATO, H.; MIRANDA, G. V.; SOUZA, L. V. de; OLIVEIRA, L. R.; DELIMA, R. O.; MANTOVANI, E. E. |
|
Afiliação: |
HERALDO NAMORATO, UFV; GLAUCO VIEIRA MIRANDA, UFV; LEANDRO VAGNO DE SOUZA, Dow Agrosciences - SP; LUCIMAR RODRIGUES OLIVEIRA, UFV; RODRIGO OLIVEIRA DELIMA; EDER EDUARDO MANTOVANI, UFV. |
|
Título: |
Comparing Biplot Multivariate Analyses with Eberhart and Russell’ method for genotype x environment interaction. |
|
Ano de publicação: |
2009 |
|
Fonte/Imprenta: |
Crop Breeding and Applied Biotechnology, Londrina, v. 9, n. 4, p. 299-307, Dec. 2009. |
|
Idioma: |
Inglês |
|
Conteúdo: |
The aim of this study was to compare the multivariate methods GGE (Genotype main effects and Genotype x Environment interaction) and AMMI (Additive Main effects and Multiplicative Interaction) with the method of Eberhart and Russell for interpreting genotype x environment interaction. The AMMI and GGE analysis explained around 50% of the sum of squares of the genotype x environment interaction, whereas the method of Eberhart and Russell explained only 9.1 and 15.8% each year. The cultivars classified as minor contribution to the genotype x environment interaction by methods of AMMI and GGE were also the same classification method of Eberhart and Russell. The AMMI and the GGE biplot analyses are more efficient than the Eberhart and Russell. The GGE biplot explains a higher proportion of the sum of squares of the GxE interaction and is more informative with regards to environments and cultivar performance than the AMMI analysis. |
|
Palavras-Chave: |
Genotype x environment interaction; Interação genótipo x ambiente; Melhoramento genético; Método de Eberhart e Russell; Métodos multivariados. |
|
Thesagro: |
Milho; Zea Mays. |
|
Thesaurus Nal: |
Breeding. |
|
Categoria do assunto: |
G Melhoramento Genético |
|
Marc: |
LEADER 01816naa a2200277 a 4500
001 1696794
005 2010-10-19
008 2009 bl uuuu u00u1 u #d
100 1 $aNAMORATO, H.
245 $aComparing Biplot Multivariate Analyses with Eberhart and Russell’ method for genotype x environment interaction.
260 $c2009
520 $aThe aim of this study was to compare the multivariate methods GGE (Genotype main effects and Genotype x Environment interaction) and AMMI (Additive Main effects and Multiplicative Interaction) with the method of Eberhart and Russell for interpreting genotype x environment interaction. The AMMI and GGE analysis explained around 50% of the sum of squares of the genotype x environment interaction, whereas the method of Eberhart and Russell explained only 9.1 and 15.8% each year. The cultivars classified as minor contribution to the genotype x environment interaction by methods of AMMI and GGE were also the same classification method of Eberhart and Russell. The AMMI and the GGE biplot analyses are more efficient than the Eberhart and Russell. The GGE biplot explains a higher proportion of the sum of squares of the GxE interaction and is more informative with regards to environments and cultivar performance than the AMMI analysis.
650 $aBreeding
650 $aMilho
650 $aZea Mays
653 $aGenotype x environment interaction
653 $aInteração genótipo x ambiente
653 $aMelhoramento genético
653 $aMétodo de Eberhart e Russell
653 $aMétodos multivariados
700 1 $aMIRANDA, G. V.
700 1 $aSOUZA, L. V. de
700 1 $aOLIVEIRA, L. R.
700 1 $aDELIMA, R. O.
700 1 $aMANTOVANI, E. E.
773 $tCrop Breeding and Applied Biotechnology, Londrina$gv. 9, n. 4, p. 299-307, Dec. 2009.
Download
Esconder MarcMostrar Marc Completo |
|
Registro original: |
Embrapa Agricultura Digital (CNPTIA) |
|
|
Biblioteca |
ID |
Origem |
Tipo/Formato |
Classificação |
Cutter |
Registro |
Volume |
Status |
URL |
Voltar
|
|
|
| Registros recuperados : 1 | |
| Registros recuperados : 1 | |
|
| Nenhum registro encontrado para a expressão de busca informada. |
|
|
